Issues

AUSTRALIAN UPDATE – Regulatory Developments, Private Equity Trends and Deal Terms in Australian M&A

Executive Summary: Public M&A activity in Australia has been patchy during 2011. Notably, the mining sector was more subdued than anticipated, with companies deploying stockpiled cash into growth projects, dividends or share buy-backs. Upon the recommendation of the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB), the Federal Treasurer rejected the proposed merger of ASX with Singapore Exchange … Continued

Editors’ Note: Ewen Crouch is Chairman of Allens Arthur Robinson and a member of XBMA’s Legal Roundtable. Mr. Crouch brings a rich perspective to this paper, as one of Australia’s leading M&A lawyers with expertise acting in some of Australia’s most significant transactions, including representation of Foster’s Group in the recent SABMiller transaction.

More

SOUTH AFRICAN UPDATE – New South African Companies Act Modernizes South African Corporate Law

Executive Summary/Highlights: South Africa and the global environment have changed dramatically since enactment ofSouth Africa’s old Companies Act of 1973. New corporate law concepts have been developed internationally, such as solvency and liquidity, new and higher standards of corporate governance, new standards of accountability, disclosure and transparency, combating of market manipulation, new ideas and approaches … Continued

Editors’ Note: Michael Katz is chairman and senior partner of Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs, with more than 40 years of prominence in takeovers and mergers and competition law, among other areas. He is a member of XBMA’s Legal Roundtable and, as one of South Africa’s leading corporate lawyers, played a role in drafting the new Companies Act. GivenSouth Africa’s growing position as the gateway for international cross-border transactions throughout Africa, the new Companies Act -- which modernizes South Africa’s corporate legal regime -- could have broad implications.

More

FRENCH UPDATE – LVMH’s Stake-Building in Hermès through Undisclosed Cash-Settled Derivatives Prompts French Parliament to Examine Disclosure Rules

Contributed by:  Olivier Diaz, Darrois Villey Maillot Brochier (Paris) [stextbox id=”custom”]Editors’ Note:  Olivier Diaz is the Managing Partner of Darrois Villey Maillot Brochier and a member of XBMA’s Legal Roundtable.  As one of France’s leading M&A lawyers, Mr. Diaz has extensive experience with the French disclosure requirements discussed below.  Mr. Diaz’s paper highlights a trend … Continued

U.S. UPDATE – Checklist for Successful Acquisitions in the U.S.

Executive Summary/Highlights: U.S.M&A volume over the last 12 months was just shy of US$1 trillion, including almost $200 billion of cross-border acquisitions in theU.S.by non-U.S. investors or acquirors. Despite some well-publicized examples of thwarted deals and fears of growing protectionism, theU.S.deal markets remain open to non-U.S. acquirors and investors.  The Obama Administration’s nascent plan to … Continued

Editors’ Note:  This submission updates a checklist co-authored by Messrs. Emmerich and Panovka, members of XBMA’s Legal Roundtable, with their partners at Wachtell Lipton, Scott K. Charles, David A. Katz, Ilene Knable Gotts, Andrew J. Nussbaum, Joshua R. Cammaker, Mark Gordon and Joshua M. Holmes.

More

CHINESE UPDATE – Variable Interest Entity (VIE) Structure for Foreign Investment in the PRC May Face Challenge

Executive Summary/Highlights: The VIE structure (i.e. reliance upon contractual arrangements to control a PRC operating company) has been a popular structure in the last decade for both foreign and Chinese investors alike. A number of recent cases involving companies using a VIE structure have exposed the inherent defects and potential legal and regulatory risks inherent … Continued

Editors’ Note:  Xu Ping is a partner at King & Wood and a member of XBMA’s Legal Roundtable. Ms. Xu heads King & Wood’s corporate practice and is a leading expert in representing international companies in their investments in China, with extensive experience in structuring foreign direct investment, M&A and technology transfer transactions.

More

INDIAN UPDATE – New Takeover Regime Provides Clarity for Indirect Acquisitions in India and Overhauls Old Regime

Executive Summary/Highlights: New regulations overhaul the Indian takeover regime, increase transparency, and represent a significant improvement. One of the key changes is the new principle-based treatment accorded to “indirect” acquisitions, where a substantial acquisition of shares, voting rights or control of a target company occurs indirectly through the acquisition of shares or control of an … Continued

Editors’ Note:  Cyril Shroff is the managing partner of Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co. and a member of XBMA’s Legal Roundtable.  Mr. Shroff is one of the deans of the Indian corporate bar and a leading authority on Indian M&A, with extensive experience handling many of the largest and most complex domestic and cross-border takeover, banking and project finance transactions in India.

More

GLOBAL STATISTICAL UPDATE – XBMA Quarterly Review for Third Quarter 2011

Executive Summary/Highlights: Global M&A volume in Q3 was relatively sluggish at US$507 billion, marking the second consecutive quarterly decline, but aggregate global volume for 2011 year-to-date is still 4% higher than volume for the first three quarters of 2010. Cross-border transactions have rebounded somewhat since 2009, with 36% of 2011 global M&A involving an acquirer … Continued

Editors’ Note:  XBMA’s Review is published on a quarterly basis using consistent metrics and sources of data in order to facilitate a clearer understanding of trends and developments.  We welcome feedback and suggestions for improving the Review or for interpreting the data.

More

EU UPDATE – European Commission Considers Whether All Chinese SOEs should be Considered a Single Economic Entity for Merger Clearance Purposes

Executive Summary: The European Commission recently issued clearance under the merger control rules for the proposed joint venture between DSM and Sinochem. The Commission considered the question of whether all Chinese State-Owned Enterprises (so called “SOEs”) should be considered a single economic entity, but left the question open for future determination after concluding that even … Continued

Editors’ Note:  Kees Peijster, Eric Pijnacker Hordijk and Geert Potjewijd are partners at De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek, resident in Amsterdam and Beijing, respectively, and are members of XBMA’s Legal Roundtable.  As leading Dutch M&A lawyers, they have broad expertise handling significant cross-border transactions involving China and the Netherlands, including the DSM/Sinochem transaction described below.  The issue of whether to view all Chinese SOEs as a single economic entity, and therefore to aggregate their ownership interests, could have important implications under many regulatory regimes and could prove to be rather controversial.  We invite comments and additional papers on this topic.

More

BRAZILIAN UPDATE – Recent Restrictions on Foreign Investment in Agribusiness in Brazil Could Have Broader Implications for Cross-Border Acquisitions of Brazilian Companies that own Land

Executive Summary/Highlights: An August 2010 legal opinion of the Federal Attorney-General of Brazil (Advocacia Geral da União) extended the Brazilian law that restricts the acquisition of rural land by foreigners to apply also to acquisitions of land by Brazilian companies controlled by foreigners. As a result, cross-border change of control transactions involving Brazilian companies that … Continued

Editors’ Note:  Antônio Corrêa Meyer is a founding partner of Machado Meyer and a member of XBMA’s Legal Roundtable.   Mr. Meyer is one of Brazil’s leading experts in the internationalization processes of Brazilian companies, mergers and acquisitions, and large infrastructure projects, all of which might be affected by the opinion discussed in this paper.

More

CHINESE UPDATE – China Inc.’s Revamped Cross-Border Takeover Strategy Shows Signs of Success, Correcting the Mistakes of the First Wave of Chinese Foreign Acquisitions

How China Reset Its Global Acquisition Agenda, by Peter J. Williamson and Anand P. Raman Executive Summary/Highlights: The first wave of cross-border takeovers by Chinese companies, between 2000 and 2007, was unsuccessful because of a number of strategic and tactical mistakes, including pursuit of inexpensive deals and troubled companies that were difficult to turn around; … Continued

Editors’ Note:  Peter J. Williamson, one of the authors of this very interesting article, is Professor of International Management at Cambridge Judge Business School and a founding director of XBMA.  Professor Williamson is one of world’s the foremost experts on the internationalization of Chinese companies and their global impact, cross-border mergers and acquisitions, and the implications for corporate strategy of globalization, among other areas, and also has extensive experience in prominent positions in the business world.  This article was published in the Harvard Business Review in April 2011.

More

Previous

Page 38 of 39

Next