SINGAPOREAN UPDATE – Court Held That Terminology “Subject to contract” Indicated Intent Not to Be Bound Until a Formal Agreement Was Negotiated and Executed
Highlights: Offer and acceptance letters’ inclusion of phrase “subject to contract” was , in the context of the factual matrix, found to make clear the intent of the parties that they were not to be contractually bound until a formal agreement was negotiated and executed. While the Court in this case found that no contract … Continued